Home » Child Support Enforcement

Maryland Punishes Parents Harder Than Criminals — And It’s a National Shame

In Maryland, a father can be jailed for fighting false accusations in family court while a teenager who commits an armed carjacking is released the same night. Parents like Jeff Reichert have been punished more severely for wanting to see their children than violent offenders face for terrorizing communities. At times, it seems easier to access your child through prison visitation than through family court. That is not justice—it’s systemic failure, and it demands reform.

Maryland Punishes Parents Harder Than Criminals — And It’s a National Shame Read More

Passport to Nowhere: How Child Support Enforcement Blocks Parents from Working

A Virginia parent faced barriers to employment due to bureaucratic hurdles related to child support enforcement. Despite a job offer contingent on obtaining a passport, an unexpected demand for a $5,000 payment plan arose. This illustrates systemic issues in child support agencies that perpetuate poverty through inflated arrears and lack of due process.

Passport to Nowhere: How Child Support Enforcement Blocks Parents from Working Read More

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund?

The Title IV-D child support enforcement program, intended to aid families, is under scrutiny in South Carolina due to alleged misuse of funds by officials. Indictments against clerks for embezzlement highlight systemic issues, revealing a revenue-driven focus that undermines justice, disproportionately affecting low-income fathers and raising concerns about due process in child support cases.

Title IV-D: South Carolina’s Child Support “Incentive” Program or Judicial Slush Fund? Read More

Who Broke the Family? How Politicians Helped Corrupt the Courts and Undermine American Values

The article by Michael Phillips critiques America’s family court system, highlighting how bipartisan legislation has led to corruption, custody battles, and financial distress for families. It examines key laws and politicians responsible, emphasizing issues like unchecked judicial authority and Title IV-D’s perverse financial incentives that harm family stability and children’s well-being.

Who Broke the Family? How Politicians Helped Corrupt the Courts and Undermine American Values Read More

Top 10 Worst Politicians for Family Values: How Their Laws and Leadership Helped Break American Families and Corrupt the Courts

The article critiques politicians from both parties for undermining families while promoting “family values.” It ranks ten key figures, highlighting their legislative failures that foster corrupt family court systems and harm parental rights. Ultimately, it calls for voters to demand reforms, emphasizing the impact of financial incentives on family dynamics and justice.

Top 10 Worst Politicians for Family Values: How Their Laws and Leadership Helped Break American Families and Corrupt the Courts Read More

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment

In Turner v. Rogers, the Supreme Court prioritized administrative efficiency over due process, allowing child support enforcement without legal counsel or proper hearings. This ruling disguised as a protective measure paved the way for administrative control, redefining justice as procedural checklists, compromising parental rights, and undermining constitutional protections.

Trojan Justice: How Turner v. Rogers Gutted Due Process and Smuggled ADR Into the 14th Amendment Read More

The Business of Broken Families: How Corporations Profit from Child Support Enforcement

The child support enforcement system, often seen as protective, is critiqued for being a profit-driven network. It utilizes administrative measures bypassing judicial oversight, leading to punitive actions against struggling parents. This system, enriched by corporate contractors, harms families, particularly fathers, while demanding reform for transparency and due process.

The Business of Broken Families: How Corporations Profit from Child Support Enforcement Read More

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business

Michael Phillips highlights the troubling involvement of defense contractors like Lockheed Martin, now Conduent, in child support enforcement. This privatization has transformed the system into a profit-driven industry that prioritizes metrics over families, leading to automation that harms vulnerable parents. The need for reform, transparency, and human oversight is critical.

The Child Support Industrial Complex: How Defense Contractors Like Lockheed Martin Turned Broken Families Into Big Business Read More