Home » Civil Rights Violations

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial?

The article critiques the unfair trial experienced by William Sewell in a South Carolina family court. It outlines the essential legal safeguards denied to him, such as a neutral judge, access to counsel, equitable discovery, and protection from retaliation. Without these safeguards, the article argues, due process is compromised for self-represented parents across America.

What Would It Have Taken to Get a Fair Trial? Read More

The Untouchable Robe: How Judge Susan Capeci’s Decisions Have Harmed Families, Sparked Outrage, and Escaped Accountability

Judge Susan M. Capeci has faced repeated criticism for her purported bias in court decisions, especially in cases involving domestic violence and child custody. Her rulings have led to allegations of judicial misconduct, wrongful removal of children, and denial of due process for litigants, raising significant concerns about her impact on families and justice.

The Untouchable Robe: How Judge Susan Capeci’s Decisions Have Harmed Families, Sparked Outrage, and Escaped Accountability Read More

Why the NY Attorney General’s Office Failed to Act—Despite the Evidence

In 2020, New York’s Law Enforcement Misconduct Investigative Office aimed to increase police accountability. However, despite substantial evidence against Officer Lane Schlesinger, including multiple misconduct referrals, the Attorney General’s 2024 report inadequately addressed the issues, reflecting political caution and institutional protection over public justice and accountability.

Why the NY Attorney General’s Office Failed to Act—Despite the Evidence Read More

Where to Report Family Court Injustice: A Citizen’s Guide to Submitting Tips and Complaints

The article by Michael Phillips highlights the prevalence of injustices in family courts, including constitutional rights violations and misconduct by judges and court professionals. It encourages affected parents to report such abuses to appropriate agencies, including the DOJ, FBI, and state judicial commissions, to foster accountability and promote systemic change.

Where to Report Family Court Injustice: A Citizen’s Guide to Submitting Tips and Complaints Read More

Is New Rochelle a Pattern Misconduct Hotspot?

Investigations reveal a troubling pattern of misconduct within the New Rochelle Police Department, especially surrounding former officer Lane Schlesinger, who faced numerous complaints yet remained protected and retired with a pension. Similar issues appear widespread, raising concerns about systemic failures and a lack of accountability, demanding comprehensive oversight reform.

Is New Rochelle a Pattern Misconduct Hotspot? Read More

Justice Under Siege – How the System Crushes Those Who Speak Out

Part 12 of “Court of Ruin” addresses systemic injustice in South Carolina’s family court, focusing on reform proposals to enhance oversight, transparency, and accountability. It emphasizes the necessity of independent reviews, fair legal representation, and protections for whistleblowers, culminating in a call to action for collective change in a broken system.

Justice Under Siege – How the System Crushes Those Who Speak Out Read More

The Players: The Judges, Attorneys, and Guardians Who Keep the System Running

William Sewell’s custody battle highlights systemic issues in family court, revealing conflicts of interest among judges, attorneys, and guardians that undermine due process. Despite serious concerns for his daughter’s safety, Sewell faces barriers from a protective legal network surrounding his ex-wife, Leslie, and her attorney, Donnie Gamache, compromising justice.

The Players: The Judges, Attorneys, and Guardians Who Keep the System Running Read More

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor

William Sewell’s story highlights systemic failures in family courts that disadvantage poor parents. Denied legal aid and faced with ineffective representation, he experienced retaliation when seeking help. This reflects a broader issue where low-income individuals are punished for asserting their rights, revealing a need for significant reforms in the legal system.

No Counsel, No Help, No Justice: What Happens When the Family Court System Targets the Poor Read More

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case

William Sewell, a South Carolina father, faces potential incarceration over unpaid child support and a hefty guardian ad litem fee. His case raises due process concerns, particularly regarding the right to legal counsel as outlined in Turner v. Rogers. This situation highlights systemic injustices towards indigent parents in family courts across the U.S.

Judicial Notice and Due Process: Why South Carolina Must Apply Turner v. Rogers in the William Sewell Case Read More