Home » Court Bias

Fathers’ Rights Are Not an Excuse—They’re a Crisis

The post highlights the challenges fathers face in gaining parenting rights. Many are dismissed by outdated stereotypes and a flawed legal system that favors mothers as primary caregivers, leading to costly and unfruitful court battles. Jeff Reichert’s case illustrates this, showing tireless efforts can still end in paternal erasure, harming children.

Fathers’ Rights Are Not an Excuse—They’re a Crisis Read More

Fathers’ Rights Are Not an Excuse—They’re a Crisis

The post discusses the systemic bias against fathers in family courts, highlighting the challenges they face in asserting their parenting rights. It stresses that outdated gender roles and stereotypes lead to the erasure of fathers from their children’s lives. Advocating for equal parenting rights is essential for children’s well-being and fair treatment in the legal system.

Fathers’ Rights Are Not an Excuse—They’re a Crisis Read More

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability

On September 3, 2025, Judge Mandy Kimmons denied crucial motions filed by William Sewell in his divorce case, effectively stripping him of due process rights. This case exemplifies how South Carolina family courts manipulate procedures to protect judges at the expense of litigants, highlighting the urgent need for reform to ensure accountability and justice.

The South Carolina Family Court Trap: How Judges Use Rule Games to Dodge Accountability Read More

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench

The family court system is failing due to inadequate judges lacking neutrality, knowledge, and accountability. This leads to injustice, where truth is overlooked, and biases prevail. To reform the system, ongoing education for judges, public oversight, and independent accountability boards are essential. Justice for families is compromised until ideal judges are established.

The Judge Who’s Missing: Why Family Courts Fail Without the Right Bench Read More

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File

The article by Michael Phillips critiques the family court system, highlighting judges’ negligence in reviewing cases, leading to rubber-stamp rulings and biased decisions. It emphasizes the emotional toll on parents who feel unheard, calling for reforms like mandatory confirmation of document review and enhanced accountability to ensure fair hearings and justice in family courts.

When Justice Sleeps: What Happens When the Judge Doesn’t Read Your File Read More

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out

William Sewell faces dire consequences following the Family Court of Dorchester County’s ruling granting custody of his daughter to his ex-wife, imposing significant financial burdens, and denying him legal representation. Despite these challenges, he pursues two post-judgment motions, arguing judicial bias and constitutional violations, determined to fight for his rights and child.

The Fight After the Final Order: How South Carolina Courts Leave Pro Se Parents With No Way Out Read More

10 Ways Narcissist Exes Exploit a Broken Family Court System to Destroy You and Steal Your Kids

Narcissistic ex-spouses exploit the family court system to manipulate outcomes in their favor, often without accountability. They use tactics such as false accusations, court delays, biased standards, fabricated claims, and alienation strategies to gain leverage, punishing their ex-partners and damaging parental relationships. Reform is urgently needed to protect families.

10 Ways Narcissist Exes Exploit a Broken Family Court System to Destroy You and Steal Your Kids Read More

Judges Behind the Bench: Who’s Accountable in the Julie Valadez Case?

Julie Valadez didn’t kidnap her son—he ran to her, fleeing what he described as an abusive home. Now she’s locked in a Wisconsin jail on $500,000 bail, while the judges responsible for years of questionable rulings face no consequences. This investigation names names, exposes judicial failures, and demands accountability in a system that punishes survivors instead of protecting them.

Judges Behind the Bench: Who’s Accountable in the Julie Valadez Case? Read More

When Justice Betrays Survivors: The Incarceration of Julie Valadez and the Family Court Crisis

In Walworth County, Wisconsin, Julie Valadez, a mother and domestic violence survivor, faces severe legal repercussions after her son sought safety with her, fleeing an abusive situation. Charged with felony counts and high bail, her case highlights systemic failures in family courts that often penalize protective parents instead of abusers.

When Justice Betrays Survivors: The Incarceration of Julie Valadez and the Family Court Crisis Read More

Fathers Fight for Fairness: DDG Custody Case Shows How Family Courts Still Marginalize Dads—Even Famous Ones

Rapper DDG is engaged in a custody battle for his son Halo with singer Halle Bailey, highlighting systemic biases in family courts that often favor mothers. Despite raising concerns about Bailey’s mental health, the court granted her temporary custody, sidelining fathers. This case symbolizes a larger issue of parental inequality affecting dads nationwide.

Fathers Fight for Fairness: DDG Custody Case Shows How Family Courts Still Marginalize Dads—Even Famous Ones Read More