Home » judicial bias

Supervised Visitation in Westchester County: A Probation-Run Program That Proves False Arrest

In 2018, Marc Fishman was falsely arrested during a supervised visitation with his son, igniting a lawsuit over civil rights and disability discrimination. Under Westchester County policy, his probation officer was present, but law enforcement acted without her approval, highlighting systemic issues in the county’s handling of supervised visitation and civil rights violations.

Supervised Visitation in Westchester County: A Probation-Run Program That Proves False Arrest Read More

Maryland Punishes Parents Harder Than Criminals — And It’s a National Shame

In Maryland, a father can be jailed for fighting false accusations in family court while a teenager who commits an armed carjacking is released the same night. Parents like Jeff Reichert have been punished more severely for wanting to see their children than violent offenders face for terrorizing communities. At times, it seems easier to access your child through prison visitation than through family court. That is not justice—it’s systemic failure, and it demands reform.

Maryland Punishes Parents Harder Than Criminals — And It’s a National Shame Read More

From Football Jokes to Family Court Realities: The Marriage Problem America Won’t Talk About

At a Cabinet meeting, Secretary of State Marco Rubio jokingly suggested prohibiting Saturday weddings during college football season, reflecting cultural priorities. However, this humor masks the more serious issues in America’s family courts, where biased decisions and financial motives drastically affect families, highlighting the need for reform rather than frivolous distractions.

From Football Jokes to Family Court Realities: The Marriage Problem America Won’t Talk About Read More

Montgomery County Circuit Court: Where Poverty and Fatherhood Are Crimes

Montgomery County Circuit Court, often seen as progressive, demonstrates systemic bias against fathers, particularly those without wealth. Many fathers face secret hearings, financial exploitation, and weaponized protective orders, leading to severe emotional and financial distress. This issue reflects a broader trend in family courts, where justice for fathers is increasingly rare.

Montgomery County Circuit Court: Where Poverty and Fatherhood Are Crimes Read More

Maryland’s Long Shadow of Corruption: How History Shapes Distrust in Family Courts

Maryland’s family courts face skepticism due to the state’s long history of corruption and scandals, particularly in Baltimore. This pervasive distrust is fueled by allegations of bias and financial exploitation in custody and divorce cases. While no definitive proof of corruption exists, the environment promotes suspicion that justice may be influenced by money and favoritism.

Maryland’s Long Shadow of Corruption: How History Shapes Distrust in Family Courts Read More

Maryland’s Family Courts: Rights on Paper, Injustice in Practice

Maryland’s family court system faces severe criticism for failing to protect children and uphold parental rights. Issues include non-enforcement of court orders, mishandling of abuse allegations, and lack of accountability. Judges exercise unchecked discretion, leading to bias and procedural irregularities, ultimately causing harm to families and children caught in the system.

Maryland’s Family Courts: Rights on Paper, Injustice in Practice Read More

The Blueprint of Family Court Abuse: Lessons from Reichert v. Hornbeck

In the family court system, the case of Reichert v. Hornbeck exemplifies a troubling trend where protective orders are misused, and parental rights are disregarded. This systemic abuse leads to unjust outcomes for fit parents and negatively impacts children. Reform is urgently needed to restore due process and constitutional protections.

The Blueprint of Family Court Abuse: Lessons from Reichert v. Hornbeck Read More

Child Custody in 2025: Behind the Numbers Lies a System Still Stacked Against Fathers

The family court system in the U.S. remains heavily biased, favoring mothers in custody cases despite slight improvements. Legal pressures and systemic inefficiencies deter fathers from seeking equal access, often leading to unjust outcomes. High child support and punitive measures exacerbate poverty, while algorithmic predictions may reinforce existing biases. A significant overhaul is needed for genuine equality.

Child Custody in 2025: Behind the Numbers Lies a System Still Stacked Against Fathers Read More

“Unwitting Accomplices” — How Schools, Doctors, and Coaches Get Pulled Into Custody Wars Without Realizing It

The article by Michael Phillips discusses how third parties, including schools, doctors, and coaches, often unknowingly contribute to parental alienation during custody disputes. It highlights how one parent manipulates the narrative, sidelining the other, leading to significant psychological harm to children and the excluded parent. Awareness and education are vital for change.

“Unwitting Accomplices” — How Schools, Doctors, and Coaches Get Pulled Into Custody Wars Without Realizing It Read More

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait

Maryland’s family courts, intended to support families in crisis, have become burdensome and inefficient, often harming those they aim to protect. Overwhelmed by caseloads, biased practices, and financial barriers, these courts fail to prioritize children’s needs. Systemic reforms are necessary for accountability and transparency, urging public advocacy for meaningful change.

Maryland’s Family Courts Are Failing Families: Here’s Why Reform Can’t Wait Read More