Home » Justice System

Indiana Weighs Using Opioid Settlement Funds for Family Court Counseling

In Vigo County, Indiana, a debate emerged over the use of opioid settlement funds for a Family Court counseling program aimed at aiding children and adults in divorce cases. Proponents advocate for early intervention to prevent future issues, while critics warn against diluting the funds’ original purpose, leading to cautious decision-making by officials.

Indiana Weighs Using Opioid Settlement Funds for Family Court Counseling Read More

Dan Bongino Steps Down from the FBI: A Disruptive Tenure of Breakthroughs, Tensions, and Hard Lessons

Dan Bongino’s tenure as FBI Deputy Director from March 2025 to January 2026 was marked by his outsider status and significant controversy. Although he achieved notable successes like solving the January 6 pipe bomb case, his lack of prior FBI experience and clashes with traditional agents hampered his effectiveness, leading to his resignation.

Dan Bongino Steps Down from the FBI: A Disruptive Tenure of Breakthroughs, Tensions, and Hard Lessons Read More

A Department in Decay: How Prince George’s County Police Became a Case Study in Institutional Failure

Prince George’s County’s police department sits at the uneasy intersection of race, power, and accountability — a majority-Black force in a majority-Black county still haunted by decades of corruption and cover-ups. From the $20 million William Green shooting settlement to this month’s $2.35 million verdict for whistleblower Mohamed Magassouba, the pattern is clear: misconduct isn’t the exception, it’s the expense of doing business. “A Department in Decay” traces how internal retaliation, political favoritism, and taxpayer-funded damage control have replaced real reform — and why even honest cops are paying the price.

A Department in Decay: How Prince George’s County Police Became a Case Study in Institutional Failure Read More

Things Banned in Maryland You Won’t Believe Are Legal Elsewhere

Maryland enforces numerous unique regulations, banning items and practices commonly found in other states. Key prohibitions include civilian flamethrowers, Styrofoam food containers, and a strict assault weapons ban. Additionally, the court system poses barriers to access, especially for disabled litigants, highlighting Maryland’s distinct approach to regulation and public safety.

Things Banned in Maryland You Won’t Believe Are Legal Elsewhere Read More

The ADA in State Courts: A Promise Betrayed for Americans with Invisible Disabilities

The Americans with Disabilities Act aimed to ensure accessibility for all, yet invisible disabilities remain largely unrecognized in courts, with inadequate staff training and compliance. This neglect leads to severe injustices, reflecting systemic bias. Court reforms are necessary, including appointing ADA coordinators, enforcing accountability, and enhancing digital accessibility, to uphold true justice.

The ADA in State Courts: A Promise Betrayed for Americans with Invisible Disabilities Read More

The Loudoun County Baby Strangling Case: When Open Borders Kill the Innocent

The horrific strangling of an infant in Loudoun County is more than a local tragedy—it’s a grim reminder of what happens when failed immigration policies put politics before protection. The suspect, an illegal entrant shielded by lax enforcement, should never have been here. Now a baby is gone, and Virginians are left asking why Washington refuses to act.

The Loudoun County Baby Strangling Case: When Open Borders Kill the Innocent Read More

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired?

Custody court judges wield significant power over families, often shielded from accountability. While some are appointed and others elected, both models have pitfalls. Suggestions for reform include performance audits and parental review panels to improve transparency. Ultimately, the system must ensure judges are held accountable for their decisions affecting children’s lives.

Should Judges Be Elected, Appointed, or Fired? Read More

Travis Decker Manhunt Enters Fifth Week: What This Case Reveals About Government Priorities, Surveillance, and National Trust

Travis Decker, an Army veteran accused of murdering his three daughters, has evaded capture for nearly five weeks in Washington State. The manhunt reveals institutional failures within law enforcement, as agencies struggle to find him without political incentive. The shifting narrative raises concerns about public safety and veterans’ treatment by the government.

Travis Decker Manhunt Enters Fifth Week: What This Case Reveals About Government Priorities, Surveillance, and National Trust Read More

BREAKING NEWS: Judges Demand Therapy After ADR Collapse

America’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) system collapsed, resulting in judges’ confusion and panic as they struggled to adapt to traditional trials. Eyewitness accounts depict chaotic scenes in courthouses. Both judges and attorneys face challenges adjusting to constitutional requirements, prompting calls for emotional support and retraining to navigate the new legal landscape.

BREAKING NEWS: Judges Demand Therapy After ADR Collapse Read More

From Custody to Crisis: A Weekend of Violence, Grief, and Arrests

The content discusses several violent incidents related to child custody exchanges in the U.S., highlighting the associated dangers and systemic flaws within custody and child welfare systems. Cases in Florida and Person County illustrate the emotional turmoil families face, underscoring the urgent need for reforms, safety measures, and effective communication to prevent such tragedies.

From Custody to Crisis: A Weekend of Violence, Grief, and Arrests Read More