Journalism by Michael Phillips | Exposing Injustice, Demanding Reform
A small immigration rally at Minneapolis City Hall spiraled into violence after being overwhelmed by counterprotesters, renewing concerns over free speech, crowd control, and public order.
Federal agents are being attacked, vehicles breached, and weapons stolen. With elections and global events ahead, the U.S. must decide whether lawlessness is acceptable—or not.
Is It Time for Trump to Act? When Protest Becomes Permission for Lawlessness Read More
The article by Michael Phillips critiques the left’s approach to Donald Trump, arguing it embodies permanent resistance rather than healthy opposition. It highlights how the left has normalized extreme rhetoric, fostering chaos and evading accountability, while using impeachment as a political weapon instead of a constitutional remedy, undermining democratic principles.
The Left’s Permanent Resistance—and Why Impeachment Has Become a Reflex Read More
AmericaFest 2025 was meant to honor the legacy of Charlie Kirk. Instead, it exposed deep fractures inside the post-Trump conservative movement—over conspiracy theories, antisemitism, foreign policy, and the limits of “open debate.” As thousands gathered in Phoenix to mourn Kirk’s assassination, the movement he helped build found itself at a crossroads between discipline and disorder.
AmericaFest After Charlie Kirk: A Movement Mourning, Fracturing, and Searching for Its Future Read More
The article discusses the increasing rhetoric from Democrats labeling Donald Trump and Republicans as fascists and authoritarian threats, which some suggest could lead to institutional insurrection. It raises concerns over legitimization tactics, media narratives, and alarming appeals to military and intelligence agencies to resist a duly elected government.
Is the American Left Preparing Its Own Insurrection? Read More
On October 1, 2025, conservative journalist Cam Higby was assaulted at Union Station in Washington, D.C., while wearing a MAGA hat during his “Fearless Tour.” Video shows Maryland teacher Taylor Alexandra Forte lunging at Higby, ripping off his hat, and striking him before being pepper-sprayed in self-defense. The attack, now viral online, has sparked outrage over political violence and calls for Forte’s termination, raising broader questions about free speech, public safety, and accountability in taxpayer-funded schools.
The Union Station Assault: When Free Speech Meets Leftist Intolerance Read More
Howard County Council Chair Liz Walsh turned national mourning into partisan theater. By raising the flag against a presidential order honoring Charlie Kirk—and by cherry-picking his words to smear him even in death—Walsh glorified division and disrespected the families of 9/11 and Kirk alike. Maryland deserves leaders who unite, not activists who mock and politicize tragedy.
Liz Walsh’s Ugly Disrespect: Glorifying Hate While Mocking Mourning Read More
While conservatives gathered to honor Charlie Kirk with themes of faith, family, freedom, and forgiveness, Democrats doubled down on labeling their opponents “extremists” and attacking the Supreme Court. In the very week that forgiveness triumphed over rage, their rhetoric poured gasoline on the fire—fueling division and empowering the radicals who act on words of hate.
Faith, Family, Freedom, Forgiveness vs. “Extremists”: Why Democrats’ Rhetoric After Charlie Kirk’s Murder Feels Like Gasoline on the Fire Read More
U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi’s recent tweet has reignited the debate over where free speech ends and criminal threats begin. While the First Amendment protects even hateful and violent rhetoric, the Supreme Court has drawn a sharp line at incitement to imminent violence and true threats. From Brandenburg v. Ohio to Virginia v. Black, case law makes clear that speech celebrating violence may be legal—but urging a mob to act or issuing a direct death threat is not. Bondi’s warning underscores a simple truth: speech is free, but violence has consequences.
Bondi’s Warning: Where Free Speech Ends and Criminal Threats Begin Read More
When Democrats threaten, harass, or incite violence against conservatives, the media shrugs. From Rep. Jasmine Crockett’s calls to “beat you down” to Schumer’s threats against Supreme Court justices, the pattern is clear: one party’s dangerous rhetoric is excused while the other’s is criminalized. This double standard fuels unrest and undermines true democracy.
Democrats’ Dangerous Double Standard: When Rhetoric Becomes Violence Read More